

Housing Appeals Committee & other Court Cases
Including SJC Cases
Listed Chronologically by Date
Shortcut to Year |
||||||||||||||
2004 |
||||||||||||||
Date
|
Appellant
|
Appelle/Community
|
Decision #
|
Case Summary
|
HAC Decision
|
Subseq. Court Action
|
|
| Upheld | Overturned | ||||||
| 9/13/71 | Country Village Corporation | Hanover ZBA | 70-03 | 1) 88 units – acres 2) Limited Dividend organization defined 3) Sewage and drainage plans must comply with state code require plans for sewage and drainage unreasonable 4) Determination of site eligibility (SJC Case) |
. | X | 363 Mass. 339 |
| 11/19/71 | Concord Homeowning Corporation | Concord ZBA | 71-01 | 1) 60 units - 55 acres | . | X | 363 Mass. 339 |
| 7/27/72 | Elio Di Biase & Ugo Di Biase as they are Trustees of the Riverside Realty Trust | Chelmsford ZBA | 72-01 | No case summary available | . | X | . |
| 8/27/73 | Bedford Town, Inc. | Bedford ZBA | 72-07 | No case summary available | . | X | . |
| 8/27/73 | Dartmouth West Housing Associates | Dartmouth ZBA | 71-04 | 1) 496 Units 2) Less than majority of HAC members 3) In case of ZBA denial issue becomes “Consistent With Local Needs” 3 criteria 1 ½% + .3 land 4) JV Language- intent of venture to be a limited dividend Corp. within the meaning of Sec. 21 5) Completion of final plans and why not require @ time of application 6) Land under water calculation 1 ½% + .3% marshes - swamps |
. | X | . |
| 8/27/73 | Lexington Inter Faith Corporation | Lexington ZBA | 72-11 | 1) 6 units | . | X | . |
| 2/13/74 | Inter Faith Housing Corporation | Gardner ZBA | 72-05 | 1) Schools - ZBA cannot deny due to impact | . | X | . |
| 2/13/74 | Orlando Todino, trustee of Glen Realty Trust | Woburn ZBA | 72-04 | 1) 132 units 2) Scattered lots 3) HAC upheld ZBA decision |
X | . | . |
| 2/13/74 | Waltham Housing Authority | Waltham ZBA | 72-06 | 1) 24 units - 3.1 acres | . | X | . |
| 2/13/74 | Whitman Housing Associates | Weymouth ZBA | 73-01 | 1) 150 units – 9 acres 2) Multi-Family in single-family zone 3) Other property zoned appropriately (Gardner Decision) 4) HUD 236 Program 5) Elderly need for affd. Housing considered sep. from all affd. Housing |
. | X | . |
| 2/13/74 | Wilson Street Trust | Norwood ZBA | 71-06 | 1) 150 units-9.1 acres 2) Standing with option (see Dartmouth) 3) SJC decision to outweigh the need for housing v. safety, health, etc. 4) School Impact-Statute does not recognize such impact as a ground for sustaining the denial of a comprehensive permit 5) Traffic |
. | X | . |
| 2/13/74 | Woodcrest Village Associates (Maynard Development Associates) | Maynard ZBA | 72-13 | 1) 156 units-16.1 acres |
. | X | 370 Mass. 64 |
| 4/22/74 | Whitman Housing Associates | Weymouth ZBA | 73-01 | Decision | . | X | . |
| 4/22/74 | Woodcrest Village Associates | Maynard ZBA | 72-13 | 1) 156 Units on 16.1 acres 2) Limited dividend 3) Complete plans not required. 4) Statutory Criteria 10%-1 ½% or .3% 5) Decision reasons for denial not part of record 6) Water Pressure 7) School Impact 8) MEPA |
. | X | . |
| 5/10/74 | Planning Office for Urban Affairs, Inc. | Beverly ZBA | 73-04 | 1) 104 units - 14 acres | . | X | . |
| 5/10/74 | Elio Di Biase & Ugo Di Biase as they are Trustees of the Riverside Realty Trust | Chelmsford ZBA | g72-01 | 1) 449 units - 48 acres | . | X | 370 Mass. 90 |
| 7/18/74 | Acton Housing Authority | Acton ZBA | 72-09 | 1) Review Completed | . | X | . |
| 7/18/74 | Hancock Bank & Trust Co. and Westborough Country Village Company | Westborough ZBA | 72-08 | No case summary available | . | X | . |
| 8/5/74 | Community Development Co. of Billerica | Billerica ZBA | 72-12 | 1) 240 units | . | X | . |
| 8/5/74 | T/D/B/ Realty Trust | Northbridge ZBA | 71-05 | 1) 150 units 2) School impact not to be considered |
. | X | . |
| 8/29/74 | Planning Office for Urban Affairs | Lexington ZBA | 73-03 | 1) 16 units - 225 acres | . | X | . |
| 9/25/74 | Hadley West Associates | Haverhill ZBA | 74-02 | 1) 242 units – 18.48 acres 2) Right to the into sewer 3) School impact – irrelevant |
. | X | . |
| 1/23/75 | Auburndale Gardens, Inc. | Newton ZBA | 74-05 | 1) 140 units – 10 acres 2) Motion to intervene allowed |
. | X | . |
| 3/14/75 | Hayward Pond Park, Inc. | Concord ZBA | 74-04 | 1) 58 units 2) Motion to intervene allowed |
. | X | . |
| 3/14/75 | Planning Office for Urban Affairs | Scituate ZBA | 73-02 | 1) 40 units 2) Title 3) Sewer 4) Traffic 5) Building design |
. | X | . |
| 4/1/75 | Pioneer Home Sponsors, Inc. | Northhampton ZBA | 74-01 | 1) 170 units – 17.6 acres 2) Community at 10% 3) HAC supports denial of ZBA |
X | . | . |
| 5/5/75 | Planning Office for Urban Affairs | N. Andover ZBA | 74-03 | 1) 230 units – 31 acres 2) HAC “De Novo” – new info allowed |
. | X | Citation 4 Mass. App. Ct. 676 |
| 7/8/75 | Hugh W. Browne, Tr. | Walpole ZBA | 75-01 | 1) 252 units-37 acres 2) Adequacy of plans 3) ZBA cannot deny upon grounds the development would impose additional costs for sewer & drainage 4) Developer cannot be held responsible for town’s deficient drainage system |
. | X | . |
| 7/8/75 | Millhaus Trust of Upton | Upton ZBA | 74-08 | 1) 65 units rehab-5 acres 2) Density 3) Industrial v. residential use 4) Water pressure-Fire use |
. | X | . |
| 12/2/75 | Revere Housing Authority | Revere ZBA | 74-10 | No case summary available | . | X | . |
| 12/3/75 | Robinwood, Inc. | Rockland ZBA | 72-03 | 1) 304 units – 20.6 acres 2) HAC approved 104 units |
. | X | . |
| 8/23/76 | Forty Eight Company | Westfield ZBA | 75-06 | 1) 175 units – 7.2 acres 2) Industrial area 3) Propane gas storage 4) HAC supports ZBA denial |
X | . | . |
| 8/23/76 | Pond View Glen Associates | Melrose ZBA | 75-05 | 1) 114 units – 6.18 acres 2) Master plan consideration 3) HAC decision affirmed |
. | X | . |
| 11/20/78 | Lewis S. Gordon d/b/a Lewis S. Gordon Senior Citizens Apartments | Dennis ZBA | 78-01 | 1) 64 units – 7.4 acres 2) FMHA |
. | X | . |
| 12/4/78 | Saugus Commons Associates | Saugus ZBA | 77-04 | 1) 266 units-264 acres 2) Reasonable-surplus verbage 3) Sewer moratorium 4) Approvals subsequent to ZBA decision 5) HAC case on hold 6) Sewer beyond control of the town 7) Denial of building permit “Nuisance Factor” |
. | X | . |
| 1/9/81 | Riverboat Associates | South Hadley ZBA | 80-10 | 1) 170 units rental - 16.5 acres | . | X | . |
| 3/4/81 | Cedar Street Associates | Wellesley ZBA | 79-05 | 1) 16 units – 1.25 acres 2) MHFA programs qualify under 40B – tenanted by persons of various 3) Comprehensive Permit not spot zoning 4) MHFA – site approval carries great weight 5) Supreme Court 6) SJC (Ardmore Decision) |
. | X | Citation 385 Mass. 651 Citation 436 Mass. 811 |
| 6/15/81 | Raymond Daddario | Greenfield ZBA | 80-03 | 1) 60 units, 10 acres 2) Farmers Home Loan 3) Limited Dividend defined 4) Intervention denied 5) Site eligibility not required 6) Appeal to Superior & Appeals 7) Superior Ct. to SSC |
. | X | . |
| 6/22/81 | Carroll Center for the Blind | Newton ZBA | 80-13 | Decision | X | . | . |
| 10/20/81 | Dartmouth Crossroads Associates & Claremont Co., Inc. | Dartmouth ZBA | 80-12 | 1) Planning concerns are or are not sufficient to outweigh the need 2) Impact on schools |
. | X | . |
| 4/1/82 | Adams Housing Authority | Adams ZBA | 81-09 | No case summary available | . | X | . |
| 4/30/82 | Sherwood Estates | Peabody ZBA | 80-11 | 1) Project before HAC is different thru ZBA application motion to remand
to ZBA denied. Changes not substantial. 2) Grade and length of access road constitutes a planning defect 3) ZBA decision is upheld by HAC 4) Affirmed Essex Superior Court No. 82-1114, 4-30-82 |
X | . | . |
| 6/1/82 | Berkshire East Associates | Huntington ZBA | 80-14 | 1) 44 units – FMHA 2) Town believes 10% reached 3) Complete drainage plans not required 4) Financial burden to the town for fire protection outweighs the need for affordable housing 5) HAC supports the denial of the ZBA |
X | . | . |
| 6/30/82 | Milton Commons Associates | Milton ZBA | 14 Mass. App. Ct. 111 | SJC Case 1) Constructive Approval |
. | X | . |
| 8/20/82 | Harbor Glen Associates | Hingham ZBA | 80-06 | No case summary available | X | . | . |
| 3/1/83 | Brown Street Associates | Attleboro ZBA | 82-02 | 1) 140 units – 8.2 acres 2) Uneconomic conditions, reduction of units from 140 to 70 3) HAC upholds ZBA decision |
X | . | . |
| 3/21/83 | South Norfolk Elderly Housing Services, Inc. | Sharon ZBA | 82-09 | 1) 99 units – 14 acres 2) Undesirable concentration of elderly 3) Adequacy of design 4) HAC amends conditions 5) Subsequent HAC amendment |
. | X | . |
| 3/28/8 | Medway Housing Authority By Its Agent John M. Corcoran d/b/a John m. Corcoran Co. | Medway ZBA | 82-07 | 1) 100 units – turnkey 7.81 acres 2) Approval with 22 conditions rendering approval uneconomic 3) Suggested finding of fact |
. | X | . |
| 8/4/83 | Billerica Housing Authority | Billerica ZBA | 83-02 | 1) 33 units “667” rental program 2) A condition cannot contain a condition subsequent which nullifies it |
X | . | . |
| 2/2/84 | Millbury Housing Authority | Millbury ZBA | 83-05 | 1) 6 units – Rental 705 Program 2) On site lighting |
X | . | . |
| 6/5/84 | Watertown Housing Authority | Watertown ZBA | 83-08 | 1) Intent of Legislature | . | X | . |
| 4/9/85 | Shamray Limited Partnership | Raynham ZBA | 84-01 | 1) 34 units | . | X | . |
| 7/22/85 | Methuen Housing Authority By Its Agent Lanam Development | Methuen ZBA | 84-02 | 1) 42 units – 5.7 acres 2) Intervention |
. | X | . |
| 8/26/85 | Quadruplex Housing, Inc. | Kingston ZBA | 85-01 | 1) 20 units 2) FMHA |
. | X | . |
| 10/28/85 | Saugus Housing Authority | Saugus ZBA | 85-02 | No case summary available | . | X | . |
| 11/22/85 | Line Street Associates | Southampton ZBA | 83-06 | 1) 24 units – 25 acres 2) FRHM 3) .03% or 10 acres 4) Aquifer 5) Water from an abutting town |
. | X | . |
| 12/23/85 | Bittersweet Associates Limited Partnership | Randolph ZBA | 85-10 | No case summary available | . | X | . |
| 3/25/87 | Crossroads Housing Partnership | Barnstable ZBA | 86-12 | 1) 58 Units – 7 Acres 2) Standing issue must be addressed during hearings 31.01 (1) |
. | X | . |
| 4/8/87 | The Ledges of Peabody Apts. Associates Limited Partnership | Peabody ZBA | 86-07 | 1) 165 units – 16.5 acres – HOP 2) Motion to intervene denied |
. | X | . |
| 10/5/87 | Douglas Lebel & Jeffrey A. Sollows, Stoneybrook Village, Inc. | Barnstable ZBA | 87-11 | 1) Permit subject to approval from another board (sewer) | X | . | . |
| 10/9/87 | Barnstable Housing Authority | Barnstable ZBA | 86-17 | 1) 20 units 2) Mentally ill occupants |
. | X | . |
| 4/8/88 | Mill Valley Limited Partnership | Amherst ZBA | 86-25 | 1) 164 units 2) Uneconomic reducing to 82 units 3) Density 4) Number of conditions beyond the spirit/intent of law 5) Conditions post permit 6) HAC modified conditions |
. | X | . |
| 5/11/88 | Ludlow Housing Authority | Ludlow ZBA | 87-09 | 1) 2 appeals simultaneously | . | X | . |
| 6/15/88 | Georgetown Housing Authority | Georgetown ZBA | 87-08 | 1) Approval of Comprehensive Permit 2) Rescission of approval |
. | X | . |
| 8/23/88 | Merrimac Meadows Corp. | Tewksbury ZBA | 87-10 | 1) 241 units – 39 acres 2) HOP Program 3) Construction approval 4) “De Novo” issue 5) Traffic |
. | X | . |
| 8/25/88 | Wrentham Housing Authority | Wrentham ZBA | 87-21 | 1) 30 units 2) ZBA requires sprinklers (uneconomic) 3) Municipal obligation to correct water supply 4) Affirmed Superior Court |
. | X | . |
| 9/15/88 | Haverhll Green Associates Limited Partnership | Haverhill ZBA | 87-14 | 1) 324 units – 12.5 acres 2) Water supply 3) Drainage 4) Traffic 5) Density 6) School impact |
. | X | . |
| 10/19/88 | Silver Tree Limited Partnership | Taunton ZBA | 86-19 | 1) 516 units – 114 acres total; 50 acres buildable 2) Interdocutory (Introductory) appeals 3) Municipal responsibility to provide safe streets and infrastructure 760 CMR 31.06 (4) and adequate school facilities 4) School burden 5) Consideration of a master plan 6) Density calculation 7.3 units per acre |
. | X | . |
| 12/15/88 | Hamilton Housing Authority | Hamilton ZBA | 86-21 | No case summary available | . | X | . |
| 5/2/89 | West Boylston Housing Authority | West Boylston ZBA | 88-22 | 1) Hazardous Waste 2) Density-From 40 to 29 overruled 3) Approval of conditions. Burden of proof. Uneconomic 4) BOH – Not proven health concerns overrides the need. 5) Reasonableness in view of housing needs. 6) Uneconomic conditions |
X | . | . |
| 5/3/89 | Edwin L. Peterson and Lawrence M. Hallaran, Trustees of Shorebrook Trust | Yarmouth ZBA | 88-11 | 1) 64 units – 3.2 acres 2) HOP Program 3) Conditions uneconomic – 25 units approved 4) HAC approved 47 units 5) Yarmouth ZBA appeals to Barnstable Superior Court 12/29/89 |
. | X | . |
| 10/12/89 | South Hadley Housing Authority | South Hadley ZBA | 88-16 | 1) 18 units – “705” Rental 2) Reduction to 12 units |
X | . | . |
| 10/12/89 | Telamos, Inc. | Chelmsford ZBA | 88-23 | No case summary available | . | X | . |
| 12/18/89 | Lee Housing Authority | Lee ZBA | 89-08 | 1) 16 Units 2) Development close to quarry – safety concern 3) Town alleges in excess of 10% • Must be under state or Federal program • Income limitations • Lock in period (deed restrictions) 4) Sewer moratorium • Power to overide 5) Town meeting vote • Power to overide |
. | X | . |
| 5/9/90 | H.T.C. Inc. | Merrimac ZBA | 89-10 | 1) 44 units reduced to 20 units 2) Town to sign curb cut permits, sewer & water 3) Appealed to Essex Superior Court No. 91-1255, 2/6/92 |
. | X | . |
| 6/20/90 | Abington Housing Authority | Abington ZBA | 89-38 | 1) 77 units - 4 scattered sites | X | . | . |
| 6/20/90 | Commons At Westwood, Inc. | Westwood ZBA | 89-47 | 1) LIP Program 2) 100 Single Family Homes 3) Extend time limit for commencement of const. 4) Changes to conditions 5) Insubstantial change |
. | X | . |
| 6/20/90 | Wilmington Arboretum Apts. Associates Limited Partnership | Wilmington ZBA | 87-17 | 1) 204 apts.-22.49 acres 2) 80/20 Teller Program 3) Intervention-sewer, water boards 4) Findings why town by laws impact affordable housing 5) Sewer extension uneconomic 6) Local Board committee can order sewer & water connection |
. | X | . |
| 9/19/90 | Mayflower On The Bay Realty Trust | Plymouth ZBA | 89-42 | 1) 80 units – 12 acres 2) Amend Comp. Permit 3) HAC upheld ZBA decision |
X | . | . |
| 11/14/90 | Wayne Walega & Richard Walega d/b/a/ Richway Associates | Acushnet ZBA | 89-17 | 1) Hazardous Waste 2) Density-From 40 to 29 overruled 3) Approval with conditions Burdens of proof uneconomic 4) BOH- Not proven health concerns overrides the need 5) Reasonableness in view of Housing Needs 6) Uneconomic |
. | X | . |
| 11/14/90 | Wheelock Grant Corp. | Westwood ZBA | 90-04 | 1) Extend time limit for construction | . | X | . |
| 1/16/91 | Sheridan Development Corp. | Tewksbury ZBA | 89-46 | 1) HOP Program Single-Family 25 Lots-11.9 acres- 2.1 units per acre- 2) Reasons for denial: a. Valid health, safety, environmental or other concern which supports the denial b. That such concern outweighs the regional need for housing 3) Role of Board of Health 4) Condition-sign plans by pro. |
. | X | 00-P-245 |
| 3/20/91 | H.T.C. Inc. | Merrimac ZBA | 89-10 | 1) 44 units – HOP 2) Amend Comp. Permit |
. | X | . |
| 3/20/91 | Stoneham Heights Limited Partnership | Stoneham ZBA | 87-04 | 1) 153 units – Sharp Rental or HOP Condominiums 2) MHFA Site Eligibility Letter covers both Sharp & HOP 3) MHFA rebuts HOP eligibility 4) Limited Dividend Organization eligible to receive funding (Hanover v. HAC) 5) HAC review not limited to jurisdiction of HAC 6) Funding is a concern of the HAC 7) Distinguish between “standing & jurisdiction” 8) Upheld ZBA decision |
X | . | . |
| 3/20/91 | Tetiquet River Village, Inc. | Raynham ZBA | 88-31 | 1) HOP-Single Family 2) ZBA decision upheld 3) Developer not represented by counsel. 4) Application requirements-not rigid or mandatory 5) Signed plans 6) Not required to go to the expense of completing plans |
X | . | . |
| 6/12/91 | Spencer Livingstone Assoc. Ltd. Partnership | Medfield ZBA | 90-01 | 1) 14 units (R-dal) 2) Sight distance 3) Fire access- cul-sac turning radius 4) Leaching catch basins |
. | X | . |
| 9/19/91 | Groton Housing Authority | Groton ZBA | 91-07 | 1) 25 units 2) Waiver list 3) Looped water system |
. | X | . |
| 11/12/91 | G.P. Affordable Homes Corp. | Falmouth ZBA | 89-24 | 1) 20 single family on 5.7 acres 2) HOP Program 3) Length of cul-de-sac 4) Environmental impact to brackish pond 5) Inconsistency of regulations of subsidized and non-subsidized units |
. | X | . |
| 11/18/91 | KSM Trust | Pembroke ZBA | 91-02 | 1) 38 units 4.7 acres-8.5 units per acre Teller Program 2) de novo – The committee can only base its decision on the issues raised during the de novo hearing and not reasons raised by the board in the ZBA decision 3) Master plans considerable weight by HAC |
. | X | . |
| 11/18/91 | Oxford Housing Authority | Oxford ZBA | 90-12 | 1) 72 Units- 13 acres 2) Adequacy of plans 3) Drainage Plans-Submittal 4) Septic System Plans |
. | X | . |
| 1/23/92 | Billerica Development Corporation | Billerica ZBA | 87-23 | 1) 80 units-8.7acres HOP Program 2) HOP is an eligible 40B housing program 3) Traffic 4) Density- Does not have to match neighborhood for sound planning 5) Drainage- Pre and Post flows preliminary plans 6) Hydro geologist report not required 7) Limited Dividend Corp 8) Site eligibility letter not required at time of submission |
. | X | . |
| 1/23/92 | Hamlet Development Corp. | Hopedale ZBA | 90-03 | 1) 60 units – HOP 2) 28 acres 3) Proximity to airport 4) HAC upheld ZBA decision |
X | . | . |
| 4/2/92 | Cooperative Alliance of Massachusetts | Taunton ZBA | 90-05 | 1) Water tank makes development uneconomical 2) 200Town House units – 32 acres 3) Developers failure to appeal an original condition does not bar it from doing so later 4) Defining uneconomic |
. | X | . |
| 6/25/92 | CMA, Inc. | Westborough ZBA | 89-25 | 1) 180 units 80/20 teller 10.3 acres 2) MHFA-site letter # of assurances 3) MHFA-site letter approval-reduces fundability issues (Hanover) 4) Redesign from scratch 5) Application List – Guidance 6) Final plans 7) Waivers – Not necessary to justify 8) No remand |
. | X | . |
| 6/25/92 | John Owens, et al | Belmont ZBA | 89-21 | 1) HOP Program-10 units(duplex)-1/2 acre 20 du per acre 2) Remand 3) Appeal of 6 units 4) Well crafted decision 5) Appellant-pro se 6) Change of subsidy program 7) Town legal fees |
. | X | . |
| 6/25/92 | Lexington Ridge Associates | Lexington ZBA | 90-13 | 1) 18 acres – 198 units 2) 80/20 Teller Program 3) Middlesex Superior Court 4) Uneconomic conditions 5) 32 conditions unusually high 6) Units be maintained as rental 7) Affd. units in perpetuity 8) Prohibits condo conversion 9) ZBA decision upheld |
X | . | . |
| 9/24/92 | Capital Site Management Associates Limited Partnership | Wellesley ZBA | 89-15 | 1) 56 units – 2.7 acres (12.1 per) 2) HOP Program 3) Remanded by HAC to ZBA – Substantial changes, reduced to 33 units 4) Fire hazards 5) Traffic – site distance 6) Children – site hazards 7) Economic viability – not within HAC purview |
. | X | . |
| 9/24/92 | Thayer Place Housing Associates Limited Partnership | Deerfield ZBA | 91-13 | 1) 24 units – Farmers Home | . | X | . |
| 9/28/92 | Wilmington Arboretum Apts. Assoc. Ltd. Partnership | Wilmington ZBA | 87-17 | 1) Transfer of permit | . | X | . |
| 12/3/92 | Northern Middlesex Housing Associates | Billerica ZBA | 89-48 | 1) SHARP Rental 2) 118 units – 8.6 acres 3) ZBA reduced to 80 units 4) Local by-laws rules & regs are frozen at time of Comprehensive Application 5) Noise standards (HUD) |
. | X | . |
| 1/27/93 | Mapleleaf Development Associates | Haverhill ZBA | 88-14 | 1) 120 units – 14 acres 2) HOP Program 3) Adequate water supply 4) City cannot fail to remedy condition as a denial for Comp. Permit 760 CMR 31.06 (8) 5) Density of 8.5 per acre is not a density problem |
. | X | . |
| 6/14/93 | Ipswich Housing Authority | Ipswich ZBA | 91-01 | 1) 20 units – 3 acres – 705 Housing Program 2) On site leaching vs. septic 3) Uneconomic 4) Other boards – (HAC) must consider ZBA decision not recommendation of the other boards 5) Fire Truck – cul de sac turning |
. | X | . |
| 6/14/93 | Woodland Heights Partnership | Bourne ZBA | 91-06 | 1) 40 units – 7.6 acres 2) Teller – rental 3) Within zone of contribution |
. | X | . |
| 7/28/93 | Canton Housing Authority | Canton ZBA | 91-12 | Decision | . | X | . |
| 8/4/93 | Anglewood Housing Development Limited Partnership | Kingston ZBA | 90-06 | 1) Interim Order | X | . | . |
| 9/23/93 | Little Hios Realty Trust | Plymouth ZBA | 92-02 | 1) Conventional 70 acres – 404 houses 2) LIP 81 units on 1 acre lots 3) Safety hazards from traffic 4) LIP approval withdrawn project no longer eligible |
X | . | . |
| 10/12/93 | Northern Middlesex Housing Associates | Billerica ZBA | 89-48 | Memorandum on Remand | . | . | . |
| 10/13/93 | L. Martin Johnson | Wareham ZBA | 92-05 | 1) 40 units – 8.8 acres 2) LIP Program 3) Move to intervene 4) Selectman withdraw LIP Approval 5) HAC supports ZBA denial |
X | . | . |
| 12/8/93 | Albro/Southborough Limited Partnership | Southborough ZBA | 92-06 | 1) Extension to comp permit 2) Extension of commencement of construction 3) 170 units – 54 acres HOP Program |
. | X | . |
| 12/8/93 | Red Gate Road Realty Trust | Tyngsborough ZBA | 93-01 | 1) HOP Program Condominium 2) Extending permit time to commence construction 3) Consistent with local needs 4) Purpose of 40 B v 40 A 5) Extended for 18 months |
. | X | . |
| 2/16/94 | Southbridge Housing Authority | Southbridge ZBA | 91-09 | No case summary available | . | X | . |
| 6/28/94 | An. Co. Inc. | Haverhill ZBA | 90-11 | 1) HOP Program private HOP 2) 120 Units (30) Duplex; (15) Quadreplex 3) 28.9 Acres 4) Co-Developers AN. Co. Haverhill Fairways 5) Limited Dividend Corp. 6) 40’ Frontage 7) Intervention 8) Down Stream Flooding 9) Zero increase rate for new impervious surface. 10) History & function of site eligibility letter |
. | X | . |
| 2/28/95 | Matthew A. Welch | Easton ZBA | 94-06 | 1) Correct deficiency bodies | X | . | . |
| 9/7/95 | CSR Management Inc. | Yarmouth ZBA | 95-01 | No case summary available | . | X | . |
| 9/15/95 | Anglewood Housing Development | Kingston ZBA | 90-06 | 1) Agreement for judgement | X | . | . |
| 10/2/95 | Anglewood Housing Development Limited Partnership | Kingston ZBA | 90-06 | 1) Application for 39 SF 12 then 25 2) Water fee $500 per unit approved |
. | X | . |
| 3/21/96 | Hastings Village, Inc. | Wellesley ZBA | 95-05 | 1) How NEF can be eligible funding service 2) 25% be low income (pg. 11) 3) Regulatory Agreement 4) NEF is a Federal Program 5) Eligibility Letter- What is required. |
X | . | |
| 9/12/96 | Anglewood Housing Development Limited Partnership | Kingston ZBA | 90-06 | 1) Frontage (50’) and set back 2) Plans ruling 3) Substantial change |
. | X | . |
| 9/26/96 | Shamrock Construction | Whitman ZBA | 96-02 | 1) HOP Program 2) Stipulation – entry for judgment 3) Project change to change utilities above ground |
X | . | . |
| 9/26/96 | Southbridge Housing Authority | Southbridge ZBA | 91-09 | 1) Remanded by Superior Court 2) 12 units rental “705” |
. | X | . |
| 1/8/98 | Hastings Village, Inc. | Wellesley ZBA | 95-05 | 1) Intervene will not be affected in a manner different from other
town residents 2) Application 52 apts. Approved 32, 2.19 acres 3) Not best design –Not a HAC issue 4) Return on investment 5) Developer’s fee 6) Because some smaller affordable developments could be built does not mean developers proposal should not be approved 7) Developer has a right to present its own proposal and neither the board or abutters “redesign the project from scratch” also CMA v. Westborough 8) Uneconomic 9) Density 24 Du per acre 10) Limited Dividend status |
. | X | . |
| 10/9/98 | An Co. Inc. | Haverhill ZBA | 90-11 | 1) Transfer of Permit | . | X | . |
| 3/5/99 | Stuborn Limited Partnership | Barnstable ZBA | 98-01 | 1) NEF is an eligible funding source (40 B) | . | X | . |
| 5/24/99 | Cedar Holding, Inc. | Dartmouth ZBA | 98-02 | 1) Elder’s Choice Program 2) Neighborhood-ask to intervene 3) Matters to be addressed by subsidizing agency (MHFA) 4) Agreement for judgment |
. | X | . |
| 5/24/99 | Cedars Holding Inc. | Dartmouth ZBA | 98-02 | 1) Agreement for judgment for Comp. Per. 2) Abutters interest greater than that of the Community at large 3) Neighborhood valued |
. | X | . |
| 10/18/99 | Messenger Street Plainville Senior Housing Development Partnership | Plainville ZBA | 99-02 | 1) 84 Rental 2) MHFA 80/20 3) Opening of hearing 4) Water Commissioner file $40,000 5) ZBA decision is consistent with local needs. |
X | . | . |
| 8/12/00 | Dexter Street, LLC | North Attleboro ZBA | 00-01 | 1) Flood plain issues 2) Municipal Services |
. | X | . |
| 6/28/01 | Farm Street Trust | Dover ZBA | 01-01 | 1) Unbuildable lots | X | . | . |
| 6/28/01 | Woodridge Realty Trust | Ipswich ZBA | 00-04 | 1) 2-Lots 2) Application recommends applied common sense not technical manner 3) Completion of plans 4) Preliminary subdivision plan definition 5) Right to cure 60 days 6) Defining open space 7) Window of affordability 70-80% |
. | X | . |
| 9/27/01 | Drumlin Development, LLC | Sudbury ZBA | 01-03 | 1) 45 Units – Elders Choice Program 2) Change for a sign post comp. Permit 3) ZBA denied–upheld by HAC |
X | . | . |
| 9/27/01 | Franklin Commons Ltd. Partnership | Franklin ZBA | 00-09 | 1) 108 units – 12 acres 2) Sight distance 3) Sewage disposal/moratorium 4) Drainage plans 5) Density |
. | X | . |
| 3/4/02 | Cloverleaf Apartments, LLC | Natick ZBA | 01-21 | 1) NEF 183 units – 1.5 acres 2) 1.5% land area determined 3) Changes to proposal |
. | X | Amicus Brief |
| 4/10/02 | Hilltop Preserve LTD Partnership | Walpole ZBA | 00-11 | 1) MHFA 80/20 rental 2) 300 apts – 42 acres 3) Municipal services – town cannot use its duty to provide services as a basis for denying a Comp. Permit 4) Schools – impact cannot be used for a denial 5) Emergency services – police/fire 6) Roadways cannot point to a bad situation which is under duty to correct as reason for denial 7) Fire protection – flows & pressure 8) Pedestrian access is an existing problem and will not be exacerbation by the proposed development 9) ZBA decision overturned |
. | X | . |
| 5/7/02 | Dennis Housing Corp. | Dennis ZBA | 01-02 | 1) 50 units on 3.2 acres – 2.7 upland LIHTC Program 2) HAC has the power to override the Cape Cod Commission 3) Nitrogen loading 4) Sidewalks considered gem space 5) Density – Proposed design over-utilized the site 6) ZBA decision upheld by HAC |
X | . | Citation 439 Mass. 71 |
| 7/17/02 | Delphic Associates LLC | Middleborough ZBA | 00-13 | 1) New England Fund (NEF) 2) 10 single family – 4 acres 3) MGL 40 A – minimum frontage 4) Applicant – no legal existence 5) Intervention – denied post hearing 6) HAC – waive doctrine of merger 7) Turning radius – fire truck 8) Developer established Prima Facie case |
. | X | Middleborough v. Housing Appeals Committee |
| 7/17/02 | Scippa, Rocco | Wayland ZBA | 00-12 | 1) Land value v. density 2) 12 condominiums 3) 1.66 acres 4) Comp. Permit Application completed requirements = common sense 5) Traffic study (full) not required 6) Application completeness 7) Reduced interest considered a subsidy |
. | X | . |
| 9/18/02 | Stuborn Limited Partnership | Barnstable ZBA | 98-01 | 1) Master plan considered – must have produced affordable housing 2) NEF 3) Condominium – 32 units, 4 acres 4) Planning concerns (master plan) outweighs need for low & moderate housing 5) ZBA decision upheld |
X | . | . |
| 9/23/02 | Transformations, Inc. | Townsend ZBA | 02-14 | 1) New England Fund (NEF) 2) 44 single family homes – 30 acres 3) Constructive approval denied by HAC |
X | . | . |
| 12/23/02 | Cloverleaf Apartments, LLC | Natick ZBA | 01-21 | 1) NEF 183 units – 1.5 acres 2) 1.5% land area determined 3) Changes to proposal |
. | X | Amicus Brief |
| 12/23/02 | Delphic Associates LLC | Hudson ZBA | 02-11 | 1) Housing Starts Program 2) 52 condo units – 10 acres 3) Resale restrictions, deed rider survive foreclosure 4) MassHousing Amicus 5) Intervention of Housing Authority denied 6) Affd. Restrictions different between rental & ownership 7) Appealed by ZBA to Superior Court |
. | X | . |
| 5/19/03 | Casaletto Estates, LLC | Georgetown ZBA | 01-12 | 1) NEF 2) 56 Condominiums - 7.2 acres 3) Constructively not granted 4) Intervention granted 5) NEF Eligible Program (HAC Rational) |
X | ||
| 6/11/03 | 9 North Walker Street Development, Inc | Rehoboth ZBA | 99-03 | 1) 44 units - 13 arces - Single only 2) NEF 3) Original Developer withdrew 4) Remand granted 5) Conditions in aggregate 6) Increase Affordability to 30% denied 7) Subdivision approval by ZBA 8) ZBA decision upheld |
X | ||
| 6/11/03 | Archstone Communities Trust | Woburn ZBA | 01-07 | 1) Units - 74.46 acres 2) NEF -Rental 3) Waiver list - failure to list particular item shall not render App invalid 4) Uneconomic conditions 5) Density 6) Local Wetland ByLaws not inforceable 7) Reduction in density from 640 to 420 |
X | ||
| 6/11/03 | Cirsan Realty Trust | Woburn ZBA | 01-22 | Review Complete 1) 168 Apts - 9 acres 2) NEF |
X | ||
| 7/11/03 | Satuite Woods Realty Trust | Scituate ZBA | 02-03 | -Motion to Intervene -Joint Motion for Entry of Order Granting Comprehensive Permit 1) NEF, 21 acres, 96 units 2) Intervention denied 3) Joint motion to grant permit |
. | . | . |
| 9/22/03 | Settlers Landing Realty Trust | Barnstable ZBA | 01-08 | 1) 56 Single Family 2) Notice of Project Change - 168 townhouses 3) Reduction of density = denial |
. | X | . |
| 9/24/03 | Arbor Hill Holdings Limited Partnership | Weymouth ZBA | 02-09 | 1) NEF 29.5 Acres | X | . | . |
| 11/19/03 | Louis Chin, and listed parties | Scituate ZBA | Land Ct. 287331 | Massachusetts Land Court Decison 1) NEF 2) Walden Woods LLC |
. | . | . |
| 1/26/04 | Atwater Investors, Inc. | Ludlow ZBA | 01-09 | 1) 241 Units - 80 Acres 2) NEF 3) Uneconomic Conditions 4) ZBA Reduction to 195 5) "Tot Lot" 6) Conditions in Aggregate 7) Acquisition Value |
X | ||
| 1/26/04 | Peppercorn Village Realty Trust | Hopkinton ZBA | 02-02 | 1) NEF 56 Units 2) Town water v. On site water 3) Unequal treatment to Affrd. v. Conv. Developments 4) Motion to Intervene - Granted 5) Conditions Economic in Aggregates |
X | ||
| 1/26/04 | Transformations, Inc. | Townsend ZBA | 02-14 | 1) 30.5 Acres - 44 Units 2) NEF Eligibile Program 3) ZBA Failed to File within 40 days 4) Prima Facie Case - must show |
X | ||
| 3/22/04 | Pyburn Realty Trust | Lynnfield ZBA | 02-23 | 1) NEF 20 units 2) 3.6 acres 3) Town water and septic |
X | ||