
Housing Appeals
Committee & other
Court Cases
Including
SJC Cases
Listed Alphebetically by Appellant
Appelant
|
Appelle/Community
|
Decision #
|
Date
|
Case Summary
|
HAC Decision
|
Subseq. Court Action
|
|
| Upheld | Overturned | ||||||
| Rehoboth ZBA | 99-03 | 6/11/03 | 1) 44 units - 13 arces - Single only 2) NEF 3) Original Developer withdrew 4) Remand granted 5) Conditions in aggregate 6) Increase Affordability to 30% denied 7) Subdivision approval by ZBA 8) ZBA decision upheld |
X | |||
| 114 Sylvan Street, LLC | Danvers ZBA | 02-04 | 2/28/03 | 1) 24 condos 2) NEF 3) Notice of decision date 4) Creation of units – when within 12 months of application 5) HAC supports ZBA denial |
X | . | . |
| Abington Housing Authority | Abington ZBA | 89-38 | 6/20/90 | 1) 77 units - 4 scattered sites | X | . | . |
| Acton Housing Authority | Acton ZBA | 72-09 | 7/18/74 | 1) Review completed | . | X | . |
| Adams Housing Authortiy | Adams ZBA | 81-09 | 4/1/82 | No case summary available | . | X | . |
| Albro/Southborough Limited Partnership | Southborough ZBA | 92-06 | 12/8/93 | 1) Extension to comp permit 2) Extension of commencement of construction 3) 170 units – 54 acres HOP Program |
. | X | . |
| An Co. Inc. | Haverhill ZBA | 90-11 | 10/9/98 | 1) Transfer of Permit | . | X | . |
| An Co. Inc. | Haverhill ZBA | 90-11 | 6/28/94 | 1) HOP Program private HOP 2) 120 Units (30) Duplex; (15) Quadreplex 3) 28.9 Acres 4) Co-Developers AN. Co. Haverhill Fairways 5) Limited Dividend Corp. 6) 40’ Frontage 7) Intervention 8) Down Stream Flooding 9) Zero increase rate for new impervious surface. 10) History & function of site eligibility letter |
. | X | . |
| Anglewood Housing Development Limited Partnership | Kingston ZBA | 90-06 | 9/12/96 | 1)
Frontage (50’) and set back 2) Plans ruling 3) Substantial change |
. | X | . |
| Anglewood Housing Development Limited Partnership | Kingston ZBA | 90-06 | 10/2/95 | 1) Application for 39 SF 12 then 25 2) Water fee $500 per unit approved |
. | X | . |
| Anglewood Housing Development Limited Partnership | Kingston ZBA | 1990-06 | 9/15/95 | 1) Agreement for Judgement | X | . | . |
| Anglewood Housing Development Limited Partnership | Kingston ZBA | 90-06 | 8/4/93 | 1) Interim Order | X | . | . |
| Arbor Hill Holdings Limited Partnership | Weymouth ZBA | 02-09 | 9/24/03 | 1) NEF 29.5 Acres | X | . | . |
| Archstone Communities Trust | Woburn ZBA | 01-07 | 6/11/03 | 1) Units - 74.46 acres 2) NEF -Rental 3) Waiver list - failure to list particular item shall not render App invalid 4) Uneconomic conditions 5) Density 6) Local Wetland ByLaws not inforceable 7) Reduction in density from 640 to 420 |
X | ||
| Atwater Investors, Inc. | Ludlow ZBA | 01-09 |
1/26/04 |
1) 241 Units - 80 Acres 2) NEF 3) Uneconomic Conditions 4) ZBA Reduction to 195 5) "Tot Lot" 6) Conditions in Aggregate 7) Acquisition Value |
X | ||
| Auburndale Gardens, Inc. | Newton ZBA | 74-05 | 1/23/75 | 1)
140 units – 10 acres 2) Motion to intervene allowed |
. | X | . |
| Barnstable Housing Authority | Barnstable ZBA | 86-17 | 10/9/87 | 1) 20 units 2) Mentally ill occupants |
. | X | . |
| Bedford town, Inc. | Bedford ZBA | 72-07 | 8/27/73 | No case summary available | . | X | . |
| Berkshire East Associates | Huntington ZBA | 80-14 | 6/1/82 | 1)
44 units – FMHA 2) Town believes 10% reached 3) Complete drainage plans not required 4) Financial burden to the town for fire protection outweighs the need for affordable housing 5) HAC supports the denial of the ZBA |
X | . | . |
| Billerica Development Corporation | Billerica ZBA | 87-23 | 1/23/92 | 1) 80 units-8.7acres HOP Program 2) HOP is an eligible 40B housing program 3) Traffic 4) Density- Does not have to match neighborhood for sound planning 5) Drainage- Pre and Post flows preliminary plans 6) Hydro geologist report not required 7) Limited Dividend Corp 8) Site eligibility letter not required at time of submission |
. | X | . |
| Billerica Housing Authority | Billerica ZBA | 83-02 | 8/4/83 | 1)
33 units “667” rental program 2) A condition cannot contain a condition subsequent which nullifies it |
X | . | . |
| Bittersweet Associates Limited Partnership | Randolph ZBA | 85-10 | 12/23/85 | No case summary available | . | X | . |
| Brown Street Associates | Attleboro ZBA | 82-02 | 3/1/83 | 1)
140 units – 8.2 acres 2) Uneconomic conditions, reduction of units from 140 to 70 3) HAC upholds ZBA decision |
X | . | . |
| Canton Housing Authority | Canton ZBA | 91-12 | 7/28/93 | Decision | . | X | . |
| Capital Site Management Associates Limited Partnership | Wellesley ZBA | 89-15 | 9/24/92 | 1)
56 units – 2.7 acres (12.1 per) 2) HOP Program 3) Remanded by HAC to ZBA – Substantial changes, reduced to 33 units 4) Fire hazards 5) Traffic – site distance 6) Children – site hazards 7) Economic viability – not within HAC purview |
. | X | . |
| Carroll Center for the Blind | Newton ZBA | 80-13 | 6/22/81 | Decision | X | . | . |
| Casaletto Estates, LLC | Georgetown ZBA | 01-12 | 5/19/03 | 1) NEF 2) 56 Condominiums - 7.2 acres 3) Constructively not granted 4) Intervention granted 5) NEF Eligible Program (HAC Rational) |
X | . | . |
| Cedar Holding , Inc. | Dartmouth ZBA | 98-02 | 3/10/99 | 1) Agreement for judgment for Comp. Per. 2) Abutters interest greater than that of the Community at large 3) Neighborhood valued |
. | X | . |
| Cedar Holding, Inc. | Dartmouth ZBA | 98-02 | 5/24/99 | 1) Decision on Stipulation 2) Elder’s Choice Program 3) Neighborhood-ask to intervene 4) Matters to be addressed by subsidizing agency (MHFA) 5) Agreement for judgement |
. | X | . |
| Cedar Street Associates | Wellesley ZBA | 79-05 | 3/4/81 | 1)
16 units – 1.25 acres 2) MHFA programs qualify under 40B – tenanted by persons of various 3) Comprehensive Permit not spot zoning 4) MHFA – site approval carries great weight 5) Supreme Court 6) SJC (Ardmore Decision) |
. | X | Citation 385 Mass. 651 Citation 436 Mass. 811 |
| Cirsan Realty Trust | Woburn ZBA | 01-22 | 6/11/03 | Review Complete 1) 168 Apts - 9 acres 2) NEF |
X | . | |
| Cloverleaf Apartments, LLC | Natick ZBA | 01-21 | 3/4/02 | 1)
NEF 183 units – 1.5 acres 2) 1.5% land area determined 3) Changes to proposal |
. | X | Amicus Brief |
| Cloverleaf Apartments, LLC | Natick ZBA | 01-21 | 12/23/02 | 1)
NEF 183 units – 1.5 acres 2) 1.5% land area determined 3) Changes to proposal |
. | X | Amicus Brief |
| CMA Inc. | Westborough ZBA | 89-25 | 6/25/92 | 1) 180 units 80/20 teller 10.3 acres 2) MHFA-site letter # of assurances 3) MHFA-site letter approval-reduces fundability issues (Hanover) 4) Redesign from scratch 5) Application List – Guidance 6) Final plans 7) Waivers – Not necessary to justify 8) No remand |
. | X | . |
| Commons At Westwood, Inc. | Westwood ZBA | 89-47 | 6/20/90 | 1) LIP Program 2) 100 Single Family Homes 3) Extend time limit for commencement of const. 4) Changes to conditions 5) Insubstantial change |
. | X | . |
| Community Development Co. of Billerica | Billerica ZBA | 72-12 | 8/5/74 | 1) 240 units | . | X | . |
| Concord Homeowning Corporation | Concord ZBA | 71-01 | 11/19/71 | 1) 60 units - 55 acres | . | X | Concord Homeowning Corp. v. Concord ZBA |
| Cooperative Alliance of Massachusetts | Taunton ZBA | 90-05 | 4/2/92 | 1) Water tank makes development uneconomical 2) 200 Town House units – 32 acres 3) Developers failure to appeal an original condition does not bar it from doing so later 4) Defining uneconomic |
. | X | . |
| Country Village Corporation | Hanover ZBA | 70-03 | 9/13/71 | 1)
88 units – acres 2) Limited Dividend organization defined 3) Sewage and drainage plans must comply with state code require plans for sewage and drainage unreasonable 4) Determination of site eligibility (SJC Case) |
. | X | Country Village Corporation v. Hanover ZBA |
| Crossroads Housing Partnership | Barnstable ZBA | 86-12 | 3/25/87 | 1)
58 Units – 7 Acres 2) Standing issue must be addressed during hearings 31.01 (1) |
. | X | . |
| CSR Management Inc. | Yarmouth ZBA | 95-01 | 9/7/95 | No case summary available | . | X | . |
| Dartmouth Crossroads Associates & Claremont Co., Inc. | Dartmouth ZBA | 80-12 | 10/20/81 | 1) Planning concerns are or are not sufficient to outweigh the need 2) Impact on schools |
. | X | . |
| Dartmouth West Housing Associates | Dartmouth ZBA | 71-04 | 8/27/73 | 1) 496 Units 2) Less than majority of HAC members 3) In case of ZBA denial issue becomes “Consistent With Local Needs” 3 criteria 1 ½% + .3 land 4) JV Language- intent of venture to be a limited dividend Corp. within the meaning of Sec. 21 5) Completion of final plans and why not require @ time of application 6) Land under water calculation 1 ½% + .3% marshes - swamps |
. | X | . |
| Delphic Associates LLC | Hudson ZBA | 02-11 | 12/23/02 | 1) Housing Starts Program 2) 52 condo units – 10 acres 3) Resale restrictions, deed rider survive foreclosure 4) MassHousing Amicus 5) Intervention of Housing Authority denied 6) Affd. Restrictions different between rental & ownership 7) Appealed by ZBA to Superior Court |
. | X | . |
| Delphic Associates LLC | Middleborough ZBA | 00-13 | 7/17/02 | 1) New England Fund (NEF) 2) 10 single family – 4 acres 3) MGL 40 A – minimum frontage 4) Applicant – no legal existence 5) Intervention – denied post hearing 6) HAC – waive doctrine of merger 7) Turning radius – fire truck 8) Developer established Prima Facie case |
. | X | Middleborough ZBA v. Housing Appeals Committee |
| Dennis Housing Corp. | Dennis ZBA | 01-02 | 5/7/02 | 1) 50 units on 3.2 acres – 2.7 upland LIHTC Program 2) HAC has the power to override the Cape Cod Commission 3) Nitrogen loading 4) Sidewalks considered gem space 5) Density – Proposed design over-utilized the site 6) ZBA decision upheld by HAC |
X | . | Citation 439 Mass. 71 |
| Dexter Street, LLC | N. Attleboro ZBA | 00-01 | 8/12/00 | 1) Flood plain issues 2) Municipal Services |
. | X | . |
| Douglas Lebel & Jeffrey A. Sollows, Stoneybrook Village, Inc. | Barnstable ZBA | 87-11 | 10/5/87 | 1) Permit subject to approval from another board (sewer) | X | . | . |
| Drumlin Development LLC | Sudbury ZBA | 01-03 | 9/27/01 | 1) 45 Units – Elders Choice Program 2) Change for a sign post comp. Permit 3) ZBA denied–upheld by HAC |
X | . | . |
| Edwin L. Peterson and Lawrence M. Hallaran, Trustees of Shorebrook Trust | Yarmouth ZBA | 88-11 | 5/3/89 | 1) 64 units – 3.2 acres 2) HOP Program 3) Conditions uneconomic – 25 units approved 4) HAC approved 47 units 5) Yarmouth ZBA appeals to Barnstable Superior Court 12/29/89 |
. | X | . |
| Elio Di Biase & Ugo Di Biase as they are Trustees of the Riverside Realty Trust | Chelmsford ZBA | 72-01 | 7/27/72 | No case summary available | . | X | . |
| Elio Di Biase & Ugo Di Biase as they are Trustees of the Riverside Realty Trust | Chelmsford ZBA | 72-01 | 5/10/74 | 1) 449 units - 48 acres | . | X | 370 Mass. 90 |
| Farm Street Trust | Dover ZBA | 01-01 | 6/28/01 | 1) Unbuildable lots | X | . | . |
| Forty Eight Company | Westfield ZBA | 75-06 | 8/23/76 | 1) 175 units – 7.2 acres 2) Industrial area 3) Propane gas storage 4) HAC supports ZBA denial |
X | . | . |
| Franklin Commons Ltd. Partnership | Franklin ZBA | 00-09 | 9/27/01 | 1) 108 units – 12 acres 2) Sight distance 3) Sewage disposal/moratorium 4) Drainage plans 5) Density |
. | X | . |
| G.P. Affordable Homes Corp. | Falmouth ZBA | 89-24 | 11/12/91 | 1) 20 single family on 5.7 acres 2) HOP Program 3) Length of cul-de-sac 4) Environmental impact to brackish pond 5) Inconsistency of regulations of subsidized and non-subsidized units |
. | X | . |
| Georgetown Housing Authority | Georgetown ZBA | 87-08 | 6/15/88 | 1) Approval of Comprehensive Permit 2) Rescission of approval |
. | X | . |
| Groton Housing Authority | Groton ZBA | 91-07 | 9/19/91 | 1) 25 units 2) Waiver list 3) Looped water system |
. | X | . |
| H.T.C., Inc. | Merrimac ZBA | 89-10 | 3/20/91 | 1) 44 units – HOP 2) Amend Comp. Permit |
. | X | . |
| H.T.C., Inc. | Merrimac ZBA | 89-10 | 5/9/90 | 1) 44 units reduced to 20 units 2) Town to sign curb cut permits, sewer & water 3) Appealed to Essex Superior Court No. 91-1255, 2/6/92 |
. | X | . |
| Hadley West Associates | Haverhill ZBA | 74-02 | 9/25/74 | 1) 242 units – 18.48 acres 2) Right to the into sewer 3) School impact – irrelevant |
. | X | . |
| Hamilton Housing Authority | Hamilton ZBA | 86-21 | 12/15/88 | No case summary available | . | X | . |
| Hamlet Development Corp. | Hopedale ZBA | 90-03 | 1/23/92 | 1) 60 units – HOP 2) 28 acres 3) Proximity to airport 4) HAC upheld ZBA decision |
X | . | . |
| Hancock Bank & Trust Co. and Westborough Country Village Company | Westborough ZBA | 72-08 | 7/18/74 | No case summary available | . | X | . |
| Harbor Glen Associates | Hingham ZBA | 80-06 | 8/20/82 | No case summary available | X | . | . |
| Hastings Village Inc. | Wellesley ZBA | 95-05 | 3/21/96 | 1) How NEF can be eligible funding service 2) 25% be low income (pg. 11) 3) Regulatory Agreement 4) NEF is a Federal Program 5) Eligibility Letter- What is required. |
X | . | |
| Hastings Village Inc. | Wellesley ZBA | 95-05 | 1/8/98 | 1) Intervene will not be affected in a manner different from other
town residents 2) Application 52 apts. Approved 32, 2.19 acres 3) Not best design –Not a HAC issue 4) Return on investment 5) Developer’s fee 6) Because some smaller affordable developments could be built does not mean developers proposal should not be approved 7) Developer has a right to present its own proposal and neither the board or abutters “redesign the project from scratch” also CMA v. Westborough 8) Uneconomic 9) Density 24 Du per acre 10) Limited Dividend status |
. | X | . |
| Haverhill Green Associates Limited Partnership | Haverhill ZBA | 87-14 | 9/15/88 | 1) 324 units – 12.5 acres 2) Water supply 3) Drainage 4) Traffic 5) Density 6) School impact |
. | X | . |
| Hadley West Associates | Haverhill ZBA | 74-02 | 9/25/74 | 1) 242 units – 18.48 acres 2) Right to the into sewer 3) School impact – irrelevant |
. | X | . |
| Hayward Pond Park, Inc. | Concord ZBA | 74-04 | 3/14/75 | 1) 58 units 2) Motion to intervene allowed |
. | X | . |
| Hilltop Preserve LTD Partnership | Walpole ZBA | 00-11 | 4/10/02 | 1) MHFA 80/20 rental 2) 300 apts – 42 acres 3) Municipal services – town cannot use its duty to provide services as a basis for denying a Comp. Permit 4) Schools – impact cannot be used for a denial 5) Emergency services – police/fire 6) Roadways cannot point to a bad situation which is under duty to correct as reason for denial 7) Fire protection – flows & pressure 8) Pedestrian access is an existing problem and will not be exacerbation by the proposed development 9) ZBA decision overturned |
. | X | . |
| Hugh W. Browne, Tr. | Walpole ZBA | 75-01 | 7/8/75 | 1) 252 units-37 acres 2) Adequacy of plans 3) ZBA cannot deny upon grounds the development would impose additional costs for sewer & drainage 4) Developer cannot be held responsible for town’s deficient drainage system |
. | X | . |
| Inter Faith Housing Corporation | Gardner ZBA | 72-05 | 2/13/74 | 1) Schools – ZBA cannot deny due to impact | . | X | . |
| Ipswich Housing Authority | Ipswich ZBA | 91-01 | 6/14/93 | 1) 20 units – 3 acres – 705 Housing Program 2) On site leaching vs. septic 3) Uneconomic 4) Other boards – (HAC) must consider ZBA decision not recommendation of the other boards 5) Fire Truck – cul de sac turning |
. | X | . |
| John Owens, et al | Belmont ZBA | 89-21 | 6/25/92 | 1) HOP Program-10 units(duplex)-1/2 acre 20 du per acre 2) Remand 3) Appeal of 6 units 4) Well crafted decision 5) Appellant-pro se 6) Change of subsidy program 7) Town legal fees |
. | X | . |
| KSM Trust | Pembroke ZBA | 91-02 | 11/18/91 | 1) 38 units 4.7 acres-8.5 units per acre Teller Program 2) de novo – The committee can only base its decision on the issues raised during the de novo hearing and not reasons raised by the board in the ZBA decision 3) Master plans considerable weight by HAC |
. | X | . |
| L. Martin Johnson | Wareham ZBA | 92-05 | 10/13/93 | 1) 40 units – 8.8 acres 2) LIP Program 3) Move to intervene 4) Selectman withdraw LIP Approval 5) HAC supports ZBA denial |
X | . | . |
| Lee Housing Authority | Lee ZBA | 89-08 | 12/18/89 | 1) 16 Units 2) Development close to quarry – safety concern 3) Town alleges in excess of 10% • Must be under state or Federal program • Income limitations • Lock in period (deed restrictions) 4) Sewer moratorium • Power to overide 5) Town meeting vote • Power to overide |
. | X | . |
| Lewis S. Gordon d/b/a Lewis S. Gordon Senior Citizens Apartments | Dennis ZBA | 78-01 | 11/20/78 | 1) 64 units – 7.4 acres 2) FMHA |
. | X | . |
| Lexington Inter Faith Corporation | Lexington ZBA | 72-11 | 8/27/73 | 1) 6 units | . | X | . |
| Lexington Ridge Associates | Lexington ZBA | 90-13 | 6/25/92 | 1) 18 acres – 198 units 2) 80/20 Teller Program 3) Middlesex Superior Court 4) Uneconomic conditions 5) 32 conditions unusually high 6) Units be maintained as rental 7) Affd. units in perpetuity 8) Prohibits condo conversion 9) ZBA decision upheld |
X | . | . |
| Line Street Associates | Southampton ZBA | 83-06 | 11/22/85 | 1) 24 units – 25 acres 2) FRHM 3) .03% or 10 acres 4) Aquifer 5) Water from an abutting town |
. | X | . |
| Little Hios Hills Realty Trust | Plymouth ZBA | 92-02 | 9/23/93 | 1) Conventional 70 acres – 404 houses 2) LIP 81 units on 1 acre lots 3) Safety hazards from traffic 4) LIP approval withdrawn project no longer eligible |
X | . | . |
| Louis Chin, and listed patries | Scituate ZBA | Land Ct. 287331 | 11/19/03 | Massachusetts Land Court Decison 1) NEF 2) Walden Woods LLC |
. | . | . |
| Ludlow Housing Authority | Ludlow ZBA | 87-09 | 5/11/88 | 1) 2 appeals simultaneously | . | X | . |
| Mapleleaf Development Associates | Haverhill ZBA | 88-14 | 1/27/93 | 1) 120 units – 14 acres 2) HOP Program 3) Adequate water supply 4) City cannot fail to remedy condition as a denial for Comp. Permit 760 CMR 31.06 (8) 5) Density of 8.5 per acre is not a density problem |
. | X | . |
| Matthew A. Welch | Easton ZBA | 94-06 | 2/28/95 | 1) Correct deficiency bodies | X | . | . |
| Mayflower On The Bay Realty Trust | Plymouth ZBA | 89-42 | 9/19/90 | 1) 80 units – 12 acres 2) Amend Comp. Permit 3) HAC upheld ZBA decision |
X | . | . |
| Medway Housing Authority By Its Agent John M. Corcoran d/b/a John M. Corcoran Co. | Medway ZBA | 82-07 | 3/28/83 | 1) 100 units – turnkey 7.81 acres 2) Approval with 22 conditions rendering approval uneconomic 3) Suggested finding of fact |
. | X | . |
| Merrimac Meadows Corp. | Tewksbury ZBA | 87-10 | 8/23/88 | 1) 241 units – 39 acres 2) HOP Program 3) Construction approval 4) “De Novo” issue 5) Traffic |
. | X | . |
| Messenger Street Plainville Senior Housing Development Partnership | Plainville ZBA | 99-02 | 10/18/99 | 1) 84 Rental 2) MHFA 80/20 3) Opening of hearing 4) Water Commissioner file $40,000 5) ZBA decision is consistent with local needs. |
X | . | . |
| Methuen Housing Authority By Its Agent Lanam Development | Methuen ZBA | 84-02 | 7/22/85 | 1) 42 units – 5.7 acres 2) Intervention |
. | X | . |
| Mill Valley Limited Partnership | Amherst ZBA | 86-25 | 4/8/88 | 1) 164 units 2) Uneconomic reducing to 82 units 3) Density 4) Number of conditions beyond the spirit/intent of law 5) Conditions post permit 6) HAC modified conditions |
. | X | . |
| Millbury Housing Authority | Millbury ZBA | 83-05 | 2/2/84 | 1) 6 units – Rental 705 Program 2) On site lighting |
X | . | . |
| Millhaus Trust of Upton | Upton ZBA | 74-08 | 7/8/75 | 1) 65 units rehab-5 acres 2) Density 3) Industrial v. residential use 4) Water pressure-Fire use |
. | X | . |
| Milton Commons Associates | Milton ZBA | 14 Mass. App. Ct. 111 | 6/30/82 | SJC Case 1) Constructive Approval |
. | X | . |
| Northern Middlesex Housing Associates | Billerica ZBA | 89-48 | 12/3/92 | 1) SHARP Rental 2) 118 units – 8.6 acres 3) ZBA reduced to 80 units 4) Local by-laws rules & regs are frozen at time of Comprehensive Application 5) Noise standards (HUD) |
. | X | . |
| Northern Middlesex Housing Associates | Billerica ZBA | 89-48 | 10/12/93 | Memorandum on Remand | . | . | . |
| Orlando Todino, Trustee of Glen Realty Trust | Woburn ZBA | 72-04 | 2/13/74 | 1) 132 units 2) Scattered lots 3) HAC upheld ZBA decision |
X | . | . |
| Oxford Housing Authority | Oxford ZBA | 90-12 | 11/18/91 | 1) 72 Units- 13 acres 2) Adequacy of plans 3) Drainage Plans-Submittal 4) Septic System Plans |
. | X | . |
| Peppercorn Village Realty Trust | Hopkinton ZBA | 02-02 | 1/26/04 | 1) NEF 56 Units 2) Town water v. On site water 3) Unequal treatment to Affrd. v. Conv. Developments 4) Motion to Intervene - Granted 5) Conditions Economic in Aggregates |
X | ||
| Pioneer Home Sponsors, Inc. | Northampton ZBA | 74-01 | 4/1/75 | 1) 170 units – 17.6 acres 2) Community at 10% 3) HAC supports denial of ZBA |
X | . | . |
| Planning Office for Urban Affairs | N. Andover ZBA | 74-03 | 5/5/75 | 1) 230 units – 31 acres 2) HAC “De Novo” – new info allowed |
. | X | Citation 4 Mass. App. Ct. 676 |
| Planning Office for Urban Affairs | Scituate ZBA | 73-02 | 3/14/75 | 1) 40 units 2) Title 3) Sewer 4) Traffic 5) Building design |
. | X | . |
| Planning Office for Urban Affairs | Lexington ZBA | 73-03 | 8/29/74 | 1) 16 units - 225 acres | . | X | . |
| Planning Office for Urban Affairs, Inc. | Beverly ZBA | 73-04 | 5/10/74 | 1) 104 units – 14 acres | . | X | . |
| Pond View Glen Associates | Melrose ZBA | 75-05 | 8/23/76 | 1) 114 units – 6.18 acres 2) Master plan consideration 3) HAC decision affirmed |
. | X | . |
| Pyburn Realty Trust | Lynnfield ZBA | 02-23 | 3/22/04 | 1) NEF 20 units 2) 3.6 acres 3) Town water and septic |
X | ||
| Quadruplex Housing, Inc. | Kingston ZBA | 85-01 | 8/26/85 | 1) 20 units 2) FMHA |
. | X | . |
| Raymond Daddario | Greenfield ZBA | 80-03 | 6/15/81 | 1) 60 units, 10 acres 2) Farmers Home Loan 3) Limited Dividend defined 4) Intervention denied 5) Site eligibility not required 6) Appeal to Superior & Appeals 7) Superior Ct. to SSC |
. | X | . |
| Red Gate Road Realty Trust | Tyngsborough ZBA | 93-01 | 12/8/93 | 1) HOP Program Condominium 2) Extending permit time to commence construction 3) Consistent with local needs 4) Purpose of 40 B v 40 A 5) Extended for 18 months |
. | X | . |
| Revere Housing Authority | Revere ZBA | 74-10 | 12/2/75 | No case summary available | . | X | . |
| Riverboat Associates | South Hadley ZBA | 80-10 | 1/9/81 | 1) 170 units rental - 16.5 acres | . | X | . |
| Robinwood, Inc. | Rockland ZBA | 72-03 | 12/3/75 | 1) 304 units – 20.6 acres 2) HAC approved 104 units |
. | X | . |
| Satuite Woods Realty Trust | Scituate ZBA | 02-03 | 7/11/03 | -Motion to Intervene -Joint Motion for Entry of Order Granting Comprehensive Permit 1) NEF, 21 acres, 96 units 2) Intervention denied 3) Joint motion to grant permit |
. | . | . |
| Saugus Commons Associates | Saugus ZBA | 77-04 | 12/4/78 | 1) 266 units-264 acres 2) Reasonable-surplus verbage 3) Sewer moratorium 4) Approvals subsequent to ZBA decision 5) HAC case on hold 6) Sewer beyond control of the town 7) Denial of building permit “Nuisance Factor” |
. | X | . |
| Saugus Housing Authority | Saugus ZBA | 85-02 | 10/28/85 | No case summary available | . | X | . |
| Scippa, Rocco | Wayland ZBA | 00-12 | 7/17/02 | 1) Land value v. density 2) 12 condominiums 3) 1.66 acres 4) Comp. Permit Application completed requirements = common sense 5) Traffic study (full) not required 6) Application completeness 7) Reduced interest considered a subsidy |
. | X | . |
| Settlers Landing Realty Trust | Barnstable ZBA | 01-08 | 9/22/03 | 1) 56 Single Family 2) Notice of Project Change - 168 townhouses 3) Reduction of density = denial |
. | X | . |
| Shamray Limited Partnership | Raynham ZBA | 84-01 | 4/9/85 | 1) 34 units | . | X | . |
| Shamrock Construction | Whitman ZBA | 96-02 | 9/26/96 | 1) HOP Program 2) Stipulation – entry for judgment 3) Project change to change utilities above ground |
X | . | . |
| Sheridan Development Corp. | Tewksbury ZBA | 89-46 | 1/16/91 | 1) HOP Program Single-Family 25 Lots-11.9 acres- 2.1 units per acre- 2) Reasons for denial: a. Valid health, safety, environmental or other concern which supports the denial b. That such concern outweighs the regional need for housing 3) Role of Board of Health 4) Condition-sign plans by pro. |
. | X | 00-P-245 |
| Sherwood Estates | Peabody ZBA | 80-11 | 4/30/82 | 1) Project before HAC is different thru ZBA application motion to
remand to ZBA denied. Changes not substantial. 2) Grade and length of access road constitutes a planning defect 3) ZBA decision is upheld by HAC 4) Affirmed Essex Superior Court No. 82-1114, 4-30-82 |
X | . | . |
| Silver Tree Limited Partnership | Taunton ZBA | 86-19 | 10/19/88 | 1) 516 units – 114 acres total; 50 acres buildable 2) Interdocutory (Introductory) appeals 3) Municipal responsibility to provide safe streets and infrastructure 760 CMR 31.06 (4) and adequate school facilities 4) School burden 5) Consideration of a master plan 6) Density calculation 7.3 units per acre |
. | X | . |
| South Hadley Housing Authority | South Hadley ZBA | 88-16 | 10/12/89 | 1) 18 units – “705” Rental 2) Reduction to 12 units |
X | . | . |
| South Norfolk Elderly Housing Services, Inc. | Sharon ZBA | 82-09 | 3/21/83 | 1) 99 units – 14 acres 2) Undesirable concentration of elderly 3) Adequacy of design 4) HAC amends conditions 5) Subsequent HAC amendment |
. | X | . |
| Southbridge Housing Authority | Southbridge ZBA | 91-09 | 9/26/96 | 1) Remanded by Superior Court 2) 12 units rental “705” |
. | X | . |
| Southbridge Housing Authority | Southbridge ZBA | 91-09 | 2/16/94 | No case summary available | . | X | . |
| Spencer Livingstone Assoc. Ltd. Partnership | Medfield ZBA | 90-01 | 6/12/91 | 1) 14 units (R-dal) 2) Sight distance 3) Fire access- cul-sac turning radius 4) Leaching catch basins |
. | X | . |
| Stoneham Heights Limited Partnership | Stoneham ZBA | 87-04 | 3/20/91 | 1) 153 units – Sharp Rental or HOP Condominiums 2) MHFA Site Eligibility Letter covers both Sharp & HOP 3) MHFA rebuts HOP eligibility 4) Limited Dividend Organization eligible to receive funding (Hanover v. HAC) 5) HAC review not limited to jurisdiction of HAC 6) Funding is a concern of the HAC 7) Distinguish between “standing & jurisdiction” 8) Upheld ZBA decision |
X | . | . |
| Stuborn Limited Partnership | Barnstable ZBA | 98-01 | 3/5/99 | 1) NEF is an eligible funding source (40 B) | . | X | . |
| Stuborn Limited Partnership | Barnstable ZBA | 98-01 | 9/18/02 | 1) Master plan considered – must have produced affordable housing 2) NEF 3) Condominium – 32 units, 4 acres 4) Planning concerns (master plan) outweighs need for low & moderate housing 5) ZBA decision upheld |
X | . | . |
| T/D/B/ Realty Trust | Northbridge ZBA | 71-05 | 8/5/74 | 1) 150 units 2) School impact not to be considered |
. | X | . |
| Telamos, Inc. | Chelmsford ZBA | 88-23 | 10/12/89 | No case summary available | . | X | . |
| Tetiquet River Village, Inc. | Raynham ZBA | 88-31 | 3/20/91 | 1) HOP-Single Family 2) ZBA decision upheld 3) Developer not represented by counsel. 4) Application requirements-not rigid or mandatory 5) Signed plans 6) Not required to go to the expense of completing plans |
X | . | . |
| Thayer Place Housing Associates Limited Partnership | Deerfield ZBA | 91-13 | 9/24/92 | 1) 24 units – Farmers Home | . | X | . |
| The Ledges of Peabody Apts. Associates Limited Partnership | Peabody ZBA | 86-07 | 4/8/87 | 1) 165 units – 16.5 acres – HOP 2) Motion to intervene denied |
. | X | . |
| Transformations, Inc. | Townsend ZBA | 02-14 | 9/23/02 | 1) New England Fund (NEF) 2) 44 single family homes – 30 acres 3) Constructive approval denied by HAC |
X | . | . |
| Transformations, Inc. | Townsend ZBA | 02-14 | 1/26/04 | 1) 30.5 Acres - 44 Units 2) NEF Eligibile Program 3) ZBA Failed to File within 40 days 4) Prima Facie Case - must show |
|||
| Waltham Housing Authority | Waltham ZBA | 72-06 | 2/13/74 | 1) 24 units – 3.1 acres | . | X | . |
| Watertown Housing Authority | Watertown ZBA | 83-08 | 6/5/84 | 1) Intent of legislature | . | X | . |
| Wayne Walega & Richard Walega d/b/a/ Richway Associates | Acushnet ZBA | 89-17 | 11/14/90 | 1) Hazardous Waste 2) Density-From 40 to 29 overruled 3) Approval with conditions Burdens of proof uneconomic 4) BOH- Not proven health concerns overrides the need 5) Reasonableness in view of Housing Needs 6) Uneconomic |
. | X | . |
| West Boylston Housing Authority | West Boylston ZBA | 88-22 | 5/2/89 | 1) Hazardous Waste 2) Density-From 40 to 29 overruled 3) Approval of conditions. Burden of proof. Uneconomic 4) BOH – Not proven health concerns overrides the need. 5) Reasonableness in view of housing needs. 6) Uneconomic conditions |
X | . | . |
| Wheelock Grant Corp. | Westwood ZBA | 90-04 | 11/14/90 | 1) Extend time limit for construction | . | X | . |
| Whitman Housing Associates | Weymouth ZBA | 73-01 | 4/22/74 | Decision | . | X | . |
| Whitman Housing Associates | Weymouth ZBA | 73-01 | 2/13/74 | 1) 150 units – 9 acres 2) Multi-Family in single-family zone 3) Other property zoned appropriately (Gardner Decision) 4) HUD 236 Program 5) Elderly need for affd. Housing considered sep. from all affd. Housing |
. | X | . |
| Wilmington Arboretum Apts. Ltd. Partnership | Wilmington ZBA | 87-17 | 9/28/92 | 1) Transfer of permit | . | X | . |
| Wilmington Arboretum Apts. Assocaites Limited Partnership | Wilmington ZBA | 87-17 | 6/20/90 | 1) 204 apts.-22.49 acres 2) 80/20 Teller Program 3) Intervention-sewer, water boards 4) Findings why town by laws impact affordable housing 5) Sewer extension uneconomic 6) Local Board committee can order sewer & water connection |
. | X | . |
| Wilson Street Trust | Norwood ZBA | 71-06 | 2/13/74 | 1) 150 units-9.1 acres 2) Standing with option (see Dartmouth) 3) SJC decision to outweigh the need for housing v. safety, health, etc. 4) School Impact-Statute does not recognize such impact as a ground for sustaining the denial of a comprehensive permit 5) Traffic |
. | X | . |
| Woodcrest Village Associates (Maynard Development Associates) | Maynard ZBA | 72-13 | 2/13/74 | 1) 156 units-16.1 acres 2) 12 HAC Hearings 3) Adequacy of plans 4) Consistent with local needs (see Dartmouth West) 5) Sec 23 – word “reasonable” and consistent with local needs denied by the SJC as surplus verbage 6) Sewage extension plans are adequate at comprehensive permit stage (see Country Village drainage and sewer plans) 7) School impact – statute does not recognize 8) SJC Case 9) Limited Dividend Organ. |
. | X | Citation 370 Mass. 64 |
| Woodcrest Village Associates (Maynard Development Associates) | Maynard ZBA | 72-13 | 4/22/74 | 1) 156 Units on 16.1 acres 2) Limited dividend 3) Complete plans not required. 4) Statutory Criteria 10%-1 ½% or .3% 5) Decision reasons for denial not part of record 6) Water Pressure 7) School Impact 8) MEPA |
. | X | . |
| Woodland Heights Partnership | Bourne ZBA | 91-06 | 6/14/93 | 1) 40 units – 7.6 acres 2) Teller – rental 3) Within zone of contribution |
. | X | . |
| Woodridge Realty Trust | Ipswich ZBA | 00-04 | 6/28/01 | 1) 2-Lots 2) Application recommends applied common sense not technical manner 3) Completion of plans 4) Preliminary subdivision plan definition 5) Right to cure 60 days 6) Defining open space 7) Window of affordability 70-80% |
. | X | . |
| Wrentham Housing Authority | Wrentham ZBA | 87-21 | 8/25/88 | 1) 30 units 2) ZBA requires sprinklers (uneconomic) 3) Municipal obligation to correct water supply 4) Affirmed Superior Court |
. | X | . |